Amazon.in:Customer reviews: Forbidden Archeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race
Skip to main content
.in
Hello Select your address
All
EN
Hello, sign in
Account & Lists
Returns & Orders
Cart
All
Sell Amazon miniTV Best Sellers Mobiles Customer Service Today's Deals Electronics Prime Fashion Amazon Pay Home & Kitchen New Releases Beauty & Personal Care Computers Books Coupons Toys & Games Car & Motorbike Sports, Fitness & Outdoors Grocery & Gourmet Foods Gift Cards Health, Household & Personal Care Gift Ideas Baby Video Games Pet Supplies Home Improvement Audible AmazonBasics Subscribe & Save Kindle eBooks
Amazon App

  • Forbidden Archeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race
  • ›
  • Customer reviews

Customer reviews

4.5 out of 5 stars
4.5 out of 5
534 global ratings
5 star
73%
4 star
15%
3 star
7%
2 star
2%
1 star
3%
Forbidden Archeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race

Forbidden Archeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race

byMichael A. Cremo
Write a review
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyses reviews to verify trustworthiness.
See All Buying Options

Search
Sort by
Top reviews
Filter by
All reviewers
All stars
All text, image and video reviews
534 total ratings, 207 with reviews

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

From India

Uddipan Roy
5.0 out of 5 stars Holy place for Real Human History
Reviewed in India 🇮🇳 on 1 June 2021
Verified Purchase
This book is holy place for deep archeological findings and explanations with actual information,not just random story telling.. U need to be technically sounded and imaginative to understand the history.
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Amazon Customer
3.0 out of 5 stars Unless you're a geologist or an insomniac, buy the condensed version
Reviewed in India 🇮🇳 on 31 December 2018
Verified Purchase
Pages and pages and pages of very detailed descriptions of layers of rock. Utter snooze-fest. Some really fascinating nuggets of information buried within the pages but you need to dig deep to find them. Such a huge and heavy book you can't even read it in bed, you need to rest it on a table. Wonderful author, totally respect what he's doing, but this is for an academic audience, not non-specialists like myself. There is a condensed version of this book - I really wish I'd bought that instead. I keep flicking forward pages when I'm reading and then feel guilty - like when you were a kid and didn't eat everything on your plate ;)
10 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Sri Giridhari Dasa
5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent book
Reviewed in India 🇮🇳 on 10 September 2016
Verified Purchase
Excellent book. Book exposes all the archaeological myths in the name of science. Everything is presented with detailed analysis. Book is somewhat bulky due to detailed explanations, but it is worthy.
9 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


kunal
5.0 out of 5 stars Amazing book..
Reviewed in India 🇮🇳 on 2 September 2019
Verified Purchase
Wonderful book
2 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Ram
5.0 out of 5 stars Amazing revelations
Reviewed in India 🇮🇳 on 27 February 2021
Dr. Cremo provides amazing details of the hard evidences that validate the human antiquity - as far as 1.8 million years ago. A must read for any sceptic
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


From other countries

Silvio A. Penteado
5.0 out of 5 stars Caution - Proceed with much Caution !
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on 30 August 2005
Verified Purchase
No one should be afraid to read this book --- It really worth the time spent, and it certainly is not a boring book. It is easy to read, and you can start at ANY page you wish. But, if you accept a piece of advice, to begin, pay special attention to the ONE stars' reviews. I could believe in - two, three, or four stars as being a honest and reliable one, but ONE star, in the case of this book, could mean *WAR*. A desperate attack w/ no TRUE consideration to the value of the book - only defending the Darwinism establishment under siege.

One could consider that it is not a matter if we agree or disagree, Darwinism is a theory of evolution. Darwinism is a theory only. It is not a fact. Many people believe it is an established, scientific fact. It is not. Scientists have been searching the world over for the missing link, but it has NEVER been found, as the foremost scientists readily admit.

That is flat, but nevertheless it is the verdict of the foremost scientists of the world today. Darwinism is an accumulation of probabilities without proof, and of attractive explanations without demonstration. Science is experimental. It is changing continually. What it teaches today it discards tomorrow. In the process of change science assumes various temporary forms.

In this way one could say that some negative reviews are in fact an attempt to STOP people from reading this material. But the more people know about anything the less dictatorial they become on that subject.

That is why real scientists tread the ground carefully. True science knows its limitations. The great scientists are humble and conservative. They know the difference between theory and fact. They distrust themselves and their findings.

------------------------------------

The authors sould be congratulated, because they spent eight years producing the only definitive, precise, exhaustive and complete record of pratically all the fossil finds of man, regardless of wheter they fit the established scientific theories or not. NO other book of this caliber EXISTS. It should be compulsory reading for every first year biology, archeology and anthropology student and many others, too! The authors` UNIQUE perspective provides postmodern scholars with an invaluable parallax view of historical scientific praxis, debate, and development.

------------------------------------

This volume combines a vast amount of both accepted and controversial evidence from the archeological record with sociological, philosophical, and historical critiques of the scientific method to challenge existing views and expose the suppression of information concerning history and human origins.

-------------

SOME say that the Vedic backgroud of the autor is one of the problems. This is absurd, since the book contain no religious arguments of any sort, Hindu-oid or otherwise. But in fact it explains that the time concept of modern archeology, and modern anthropology in general, resembles the general cosmological-historical time concept of Europe`s Judeo-Christian culture, and that modern archeology also shares w/ Judeo-Christian teology the idea that humans appear after the other major species.

-------------

Perhaps as a first step our textbooks should be more realistic and honest about what we know and don't know.

I've decided to give the authors a chance. And ---

The book reveals that over the past two centuries researchers have found bones and artifacts showing that people like ourselves existed on earth millions of years ago. But the scientific establishment has ignored these remarkable facts because they contradict the dominant views of human origins and antiquity. Cremo and Thompson challenge us to rethink our understanding of human origins, identity, and destiny. And invites us to take a courageous first step towards a new perspective.

You can find a sample chapter at (mcremo dot com)

----------------

Some consider the purpose of science SHOULD be to develop, without prejudice or preconception of any kind, a knowledge of the facts, the laws and the processes of nature.

----------------

OR to serve humanity, explain how things happen. And the quality of that service depends on the person or persons using science.

"The only statement consistent with her dignity that science can make is to say that she knows nothing about the origin of man." (Modern Biology, p. 480.)

Are some of us attached to Darwinism for reasons other than really scientific ones?

ON Darwinism -

Darwinism is an attempt to explain how one species of plant or animal changed into another altogether distinct and different species. Darwinism, therefore, takes for granted that evolution is a fact, namely, that the various species we see in the world today are transitions from preceding different species.

Yet today in many of our school text-books students are taught that in accordance with Darwinism man has descended from the monkey. If you call in question their infallibility they will give you a look of pity.

The author attests that there are TWO kinds of Darwinists. The first is the fundamentalist type and the second more open-minded Darwinists that can give platforms to present diferent views at scientific societies, scientific conferences, and science departments at universities around the world.

There are some scientists who have reported that Homo habilis (the "handy man") and Australopithecus afarensis ("Lucy") were constructed from bones of two or more species, yet these hominids also do have their supporters.

Despite the controversy, models of these hominids are in fact STILL displayed in many museums. These exhibits give no hint of the controversy that exists about these creatures in the scientific world. In this way, people are being MISLED.

Of course, the museums also give no hint of the archeological evidence for extreme human antiquity, the evidence that shows that humans like us existed alongside our supposed ape-man ancestors, like Homo habilis and Australopithecus afarensis.

A variation of a species is not an essentially different species. And - even if evolution were a fact, Darwinism does not and cannot explain it. The foremost scientists of the world are now agreed that Darwin's theory of natural selection does not work all the times.

----------------

Mr Cremo is not the ONLY person challenging the now dominant Darwinian theory of evolution. That doctrine is now under sustained attack from many directions.

----------------

Some say that supporters of the Darwinist paradigm are now in the beginning stages of a major crisis, as can be judged from the volume of the howls of protest coming from them.

Indeed, according to philosopher of science, Karl Popper, all scientific theories must be "falsifiable," that is, subject to prediction, testing and falsification. In his book, Conjectures and Refutations, he explains, "There will be well-testable theories, hardly testable theories, and non-testable theories. Those which are non-testable are of no interest to empirical scientists. They may be described as metaphysical."

"It must be acknowledged that Forbidden Archeology brings to attention many interesting issues that have not received much consideration from historians; and the authors' detailed examination of the early literature is certainly stimulating and raises questions of considerable interest, both historically and from the perspective of practitioners of sociology of scientific knowledge." Jo Wodak and David Oldroyd, in Social Studies of Science, Vol. 26(1), 1996, p. 196.

----------------

----------------

According to a statement of a dear friend of mine:

"As an undergraduate anthropology major, my first physical anthropology course was quite an experience. It was the 1st meeting of the class that is hard to forget. In the midst of jokes there was an unsettling undercurrent. The instructor was not so jovial about one thing: that Darwinian evolution was a FACT and NOT a THEORY. She warned us in no uncertain terms that she would entertain NO questions with regard to the facticity of evolution. What struck me as odd at the time was her tone of exasperation at even the anticipation of an underling wasting her time arguing this 'fact.'"

"Well, noses run in my family too. I knew, right off the proverbial bat wing, that something smelled fishy, but it took me several years to realize that she was only one of the countless college professors, biologists, science writers, scientific researchers, philosophers, and publishers with a vested psychological, emotional and financial interest in Darwinian evolution. Evolutionary theorists bank on the hope that this theory is too complicated for most of us to fathom, and that we will not ask questions out of fear of appearing ignorant of the supposed facts. More often than not, however, the questions most people have about evolution are very appropriate and intelligent. The truth is, some logic and a little horse sense is really all you need to understand what Darwin was trying to say. It's the mess his followers, so-called neo-Darwinists, have made of it that often takes real patience to decipher"

----------------

----------------

For quite the same reasons as above, British astronomer, Sir Fred Hoyle, proponent of the Modern Theory of Panspermia, has mathematically dismissed the chance of evolution being an actual occurrence, arguing that "even if the whole Universe consisted of organic soup ... the chance of producing merely the basic enzymes of life by random processes without intelligent direction would be about 1 over a 1 with 40,000 zeros after it; a probability too small to imagine."

Hoyle concludes that "Darwinian evolution is most unlikely to get even one polypeptide sequence right, let alone the thousands on which living cells depend for survival."

-----------------------

To finish my review ---

-----------------------

=>Darwin's Many Errors<=

Numerous books could be written about Darwin's many errors, and many excellent books have been written.

Another of Darwin's significant errors was actually the basis for his natural selection hypothesis: that is, the "struggle for existence." Darwin drew an analogy from Thomas Malthus's view of the human "struggle for existence" to animals in the wild, claiming that animals fight for the same "niches." Darwin proposed that due to this struggle animals were forced to evolve into subsidiary forms in order to survive in different niches.

In fact, as we now know from a profusion of animal studies, animal populations do not conform to this prognosis. As Lee Spetner notes, "Darwin erred in the insight that led him to his theory of evolution.

Animals do not hug the brink of disaster. Population size is not controlled by starvation, disease or predation. Populations are kept in check ... by intrinsic forces built into the animals themselves."

There is no struggle for existence in the animal world. This point is also made starkly clear in James Lovelock and Lynn Margulis's GAIA Theory.

Darwin's second error, according to Spetner, is that if positive mutations occurred often enough, they "may readily become established in the populations."

As Spetner notes, this has been shown to be wrong. "Darwin erroneously thought that even the smallest improvements would be selected," in individuals and saved in the population like hitting the "saved" button.

In fact, paleontologist, George Gaylord Simpson, acknowledged that "a single mutation has little chance of staying in the population." Spetner points out a common error in popular Darwinist writings that might lead to this misconception. Darwinists tend to transpose the language of "transmission genetics" (how individuals pass on their genes to descendants) into the language of "population genetics" (how gene frequencies change in a population) without noting that they are talking about two different things.

=======================================

(Spetner, 56) Following is a list of just some of the problematic assumptions of the NDT that Spetner magnificently highlights:

* =>Genetic rearrangements appear to be non-random they occur with precision

* =>Mutations in higher animals are infrequent

* =>Rarity of copying errors, low error rates in DNA copying

* =>NDT allows only the smallest mutation rate. A mutation must be both beneficial and must also add a little bit of information to the genome, but not too much information

* =>In order to explain all the complexity around us, a mutation must add information. There are no known, clear examples of a mutation that has added information.

* =>The mutation that leads to the improvement must be a dominant gene, that is, must be expressed in the phenotype even if it's on only one of the two chromosomes that carries the gene. Otherwise, the male and female (if it were a recessive gene) would have to find each other to mate.

* =>A mutation, even if favorable, has a small chance of establishing itself in the species if it occurs only once. Slight individual improvements have a tendency to disappear in the population.

* =>Small populations promote the survival of a single gene more than large ones do. This poses a problem for the NDT.

As Spetner writes, "The events necessary for cumulative selection are much too improbable to build a theory on.

The events needed for the origin of life are even more improbable."

Spetner concludes:

There may be good reasons for being an atheist, but the neo-Darwinian Theory of Evolution isn't one of them.

- Lee Spetner, Not By Chance

----------------------------------

Suggested Reading in - Darwinian Dissent / Intelligent Design / History of Science / Conscious Universe

*Gregory Bateson, et. al.

Angels Fear: Towards an Epistemology of the Sacred.

Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity (Advances in Systems Theory, Complexity, and the Human Sciences).

Sacred Unity.

*Michael Behe, et al.

Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge To Evolution.

Science and Evidence for Design in the Universe.

*David Bohm

Thought As a System.

The Undivided Universe.

Wholeness and the Implicate Order.

*Deepak Chopra, et. al.

The Conscious Universe.

The Cosmic Mind and the Submanifest Order of Being.

The Quantum Physics of Soul and Spirit.

Science and Soul: The Survival of Consciousness After Death.

*Michael Cremo

Forbidden Archeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race (1998)

The Hidden History of the Human Race (Condensed Edition) (1999)

Forbidden Archeology's Impact: How a Controversial New Book Shocked the Scientific Community and Became an Underground Classic (1998)

Human Devolution: A Vedic Alternative to Darwin's Theory (2003)

*William Dembski, et. al.

The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance through Small Probabilities.

The Design Revolution: Answering the Toughest Questions about Intelligent Design.

How Blind Is the Watchmaker?: Nature's Design
66 people found this helpful
Report abuse
spiritus
5.0 out of 5 stars Startling, impressive.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 on 17 May 2014
Verified Purchase
Those of you who have ever been interested in what in the philosophy of science is called 'the demarcation problem', namely, what exactly distinguishes science from non-science (or pseudoscience) will be familiar with the work of Thomas Kuhn, author of the epochal work The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Kuhn makes some rather interesting observations about science as it is actually practised in the real world. Rather than being objective, unbiased and value-free, scientific research is carried out within a rather narrow set of assumptions contained within an operating paradigm. Paradigms are dogmas of the day within which 'normal science' takes place. You might think as a non-scientist (most people are not research scientists who have published in peer reviewed scientific journals) that research papers always confirm the basic correctness of the paradigm of the day. On the contrary, Kuhn showed that a significant percentage of scientific research does not support the accepted paradigms of the day but are sometimes freakishly opposed to them. These research papers are generally written off as 'anomalous', put to one side and forgotten about or ignored as bizarre embarrassments. Eventually, Kuhn says, these anomalies build up nontheless and provide the material that in time sets science into an 'extraordinary' phase that results in the proverbial 'paradigm shift' namely the creation of a new paradigm in which a new worldview emerges. Quantum Physics emerged as a result of the problems posed by the Ultraviolet Catastrophe; the Copernican revolution was a result of the anomalies left by the astronomical observations within the geocentric paradigm and so on. Humans always assume that the worldview of their day is correct even though when we look back to the past we see that humans believed things that are nowadays considered clearly wrong. However, we don't consider that in two hundred years humans will look back to our own day and say "How foolish they were to believe such things!".

There are in every age, Cremo contends, knowledge filters that prevent certain kinds of knowledge from entering the mainstream consciousness. This can also work another way as well. I am referring here to what in the philosophy of science (and historiography generally) is called 'whiggism'. This is the naive assumption that the way people saw things in the past was inherently more stupid and inferior to the way we see things now. Many, today, however, are looking to the past to recover forms of wisdom and knowledge that modern man has all but lost. For example, many people today do actually believe in the reality of reincarnation and understand that this view of human destiny must use a different evolutionary paradigm than Darwinian evolution by natural selection.

Forbidden Archaeology is a compendium of anomalous scientific papers which suggest that anatomically modern humans have walked on the Earth for much longer than the accepted current paradigm allows for. Cremo takes the view that the anomalous scientific papers that support this thesis show that there is something wrong with the current paradigm of human evolution. However, rather than acknowledging these perfectly valid scientific studies mainstream science has pushed them to one side and ignored them. Frankly speaking, contrary to what people like Richard Dawkins and Jerry Coyne will have you believe it is becoming increasingly understood in biology that natural selection is not the principal engine of evolution. Natural selection is a filter but does not account for the creative dimension in evolution. There is something other than random mutations at work in nature that is responsible for the stunning archetypes and order of the natural world. Cremo takes the view that evolution is not a blind process but one that results as a product of successive incarnations of souls into material form. This is the traditional view of the vedic seers and other Indian philosophers such as Lord Buddha, Mahavira, Adi Sankara and others. If biological evolution is based on the evolution of the soul it is not subject to the linear historical model of evolution but a trans-historical model that connects one time space location to another in a very different way. If true this would require a major paradigm shift in our way of looking at human evolution. Obviously we do not understand this at present but reincarnation science may be a not very far away reality.

Anyhow, many of you may find these ideas kooky beyond belief but it does show how we are very attached to fundamental assumptions about the nature of reality. The great Mary Midgley has pointed out how people blindly defend their scientific paradigms as passionately as religious folk defend theirs. If there is plenty of anomalous data to at least entertain the idea that our working paradigms may not be as set in stone as we fancy shouldn't we at least allow researchers such as Cremo to express his point of view without forcing him to the sidelines?
46 people found this helpful
Report abuse
S. L. Marchant
5.0 out of 5 stars Eye opener
Reviewed in the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 on 10 August 2022
Verified Purchase
Bought this as I wanted to re-read and couldn't find my original copy. Anyone slightly interested about the origins of humans on this planet should read.
No matter what science, or other specialist tell us, they can all be wrong.
Example : - At school in the 1960's and at various locations around the UK (i.e. Crystal Palace) information on dinosaurs was that they were all slow, imbecilic reptiles that had to lay around in the sun all day to get energy. How wrong that now is.
Nearly 200years ago it seems various branches of science knew more about humans on earth and how ancient they were.
However this information doesn't fit with todays paradigm, so it is quietly buried after dubious excersises in discrediting it. Read this and make up your own mind.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
ZyPhReX
5.0 out of 5 stars Outstanding Book
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on 31 January 2013
Verified Purchase
Absolutely without a doubt love this book. Began reading Mr. Cremo's particular piece a bit ago, in which he published his articles from Atlantis Rising magazine, and it only opened up more pathways of research. Due to that, we were prompted to get this particular book, Forbidden Archeology.

Michael Cremo is an outstanding author, and irrespective if you believe his theory or not, the foundation for his research is impeccable, and the simple fact that he does make one THINK [which not many do as they have a vested interested in keeping current theories going, regardless of how ludicrous they sound] outside institutional norm is great, or dare one say, fantastic.

The book cites countless examples in our pre-history in which there is evidence that points to....well....how can one put this, the possibility that humanity has more astonishing roots than what we are taught to believe. The sad part is that our particular system does not allow one to THINK - it only indoctrinates folks into regurgitating information. How can that be thought of as constructive? This dilemma, which dovetails into what Michael Cremo calls a 'filtration' system, is part of the reason we are not taught the truth about MANY subjects, including archeology.

Energy, health, archeology, schooling, aviation [specifically antigravity propulsion systems], fluoride, genetically modified food, and a MYRIAD of other issues are painted over with a fined tooth comb of Academia, which are only serving the interests of those with the 'money'. I put money in quotation marks, because paper dollars are not money, as they are only federal reserve notes.

This is one book my wife and I will use to teach our children in the not to near future. It SHOULD be taught in all schools, but then again most schools don't teach anything you can't learn in a library anyways, which begs the question, why are they there in the first place?

Apologize for the tangents; its just that it gets tiring knowing how much informational/technological suppression there is out there in many facets of our lives, while also knowing there's great tools such as this book which many don't even know exists.

With that said, if you've made it this far reading this review, it is highly recommended that you get it if you wish to delve deeper into this extremely abstruse subject. It is extremely fascinating because IF what Michael Cremo proposes as a theory is in any way correct, then that would change our history in an instant. And if many have 'missed' that [intentionally or not] then what ELSE could we be missing?

Is there more? Are more questions looming on the horizon? Are we being lied too? If so, by whom, and cui bono, who benefits?

Make sure that regardless of topic you do all the research YOU need to do in order to figure out what makes sense to YOU and not what you are being told by someone else just because someone has money and has a great interest in keeping the current paradigm running. Don't believe anything said here either. Do your own due diligence and don't take anything, ANYTHING for granted.

The world is far more wondrous than what we are being told, and if people stood up like Mr. Michael Cremo have, and many others, this world would change in a day. Our world needs more people like him, that is for certain.
28 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Simon Smith
4.0 out of 5 stars Very good and also very boring.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 on 27 February 2014
Verified Purchase
I came to this book from Michael Cremo's videos which are very interesting. He himself jokes that his book is often called "Forbidding Archaeology".

He goes into great detail , and in my opinion, uses a sledgehammer to crack a nut. This is the simile that came to mind when reading the details of how stone age tools are created - again and again and again. I challenge anyone to say they found this interesting. I'm a third way through the book and it's very boring. I can see how he wants to create a reference work to put the mainstream salaried bods in their place , but believe the author does a disservice to his readers by being so bloody boring.

I share with Mr Cremo my distaste for the religious fervour of current archaeologists who cling to the current paradigm (as well as to their status , need to pay their mortgages etc).On the subject of religion he does subscribe to the Vedic philosophy/religion,which I too admire, but don't believe it should necessarily inform his scientific enquiry as much as it does.

I deduct a star because he creates a strawman out of the "mainstream's" coupling of modern man resulting through evolution AND within the last 100,000 years or so. Because IMHO he successfully, and TO HIS CREDIT shows ancient origins of mankind beyond the range which salaried paradigm filling archaeological mortgage payers are touting, BUT seems to give the impression that other forms of older evolution are necessarily ruled out. He does indicate that this can be argued, but his lake of emphasis, which suggests otherwise, might be informed by his own religious sensibilities that gives a subconscious blindspot to reason - I'm saying in his defence, his "strawman" argument may not be a conscious one.

In the interests of the truth of mankind's origins I believe that we might wish to factor in the ET interference on the basis that modern grey abductions, suggest genetic engineering going back even further than modern testimonies.

I wish I had bought the abridged version - but good luck to Michael Cremo and his future work. I do admire his hard work, intelligence and going into bat against the mainstream paradigm fillers !
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
  • ←Previous page
  • Next page→

Need customer service? Click here
‹ See all details for Forbidden Archeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race

Your recently viewed items and featured recommendations
›
View or edit your browsing history
After viewing product detail pages, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.

Back to top
Get to Know Us
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Press Releases
  • Amazon Science
Connect with Us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Make Money with Us
  • Sell on Amazon
  • Sell under Amazon Accelerator
  • Protect and Build Your Brand
  • Amazon Global Selling
  • Become an Affiliate
  • Fulfilment by Amazon
  • Advertise Your Products
  • Amazon Pay on Merchants
Let Us Help You
  • COVID-19 and Amazon
  • Your Account
  • Returns Centre
  • 100% Purchase Protection
  • Amazon App Download
  • Amazon Assistant Download
  • Help
English
  • Australia
  • Brazil
  • Canada
  • China
  • France
  • Germany
  • Italy
  • Japan
  • Mexico
  • Netherlands
  • Poland
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Turkey
  • United Arab Emirates
  • United Kingdom
  • United States
AbeBooks
Books, art
& collectibles
Amazon Web Services
Scalable Cloud
Computing Services
Audible
Download
Audio Books
DPReview
Digital
Photography
IMDb
Movies, TV
& Celebrities
 
Shopbop
Designer
Fashion Brands
Amazon Business
Everything For
Your Business
Prime Now
2-Hour Delivery
on Everyday Items
Amazon Prime Music
90 million songs, ad-free
Over 15 million podcast episodes
 
  • Conditions of Use & Sale
  • Privacy Notice
  • Interest-Based Ads
© 1996-2023, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates