More Than Happiness: Buddhist and Stoic Wisdom for a Sceptical Age Hardcover – 4 January 2018
Enhance your purchase
About the Author
Antonia Macaro is an existential psychotherapist, co-author of The Shrink and the Sage, and author of Reason, Virtue and Psychotherapy. She has many years’ clinical experience in the field of addictive behaviours. Antonia has a degree in Oriental Studies and an MA in Philosophy, and was part of the UK’s philosophical counselling movement from its early days.
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter mobile phone number.
- ASIN : 1785781332
- Publisher : Icon Books Ltd (4 January 2018)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 208 pages
- ISBN-10 : 9781785781339
- ISBN-13 : 978-1785781339
- Item Weight : 318 g
- Dimensions : 12.95 x 2.54 x 20.07 cm
- Country of Origin : United Kingdom
- Best Sellers Rank: #105,694 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Review this product
Top reviews from other countries
The ghost of Aristotle spreads throughout the pages, for rather than explicate dogmas, slogans, pretty 'fridge magnet' phrases, it seeks moderation, gently suggesting - and no more - how certain aspects of the two traditions may be useful to not 'us' but to 'I', the individual reader.
It is beautifully written. It never deviates from the idea that philosophy is or should be a guide to how to live a flourishing, best possible life. That life is limited, constrained and inescapably unsatisfactory. Suffering and mortality alone make it so, hardly an observation unique to Stoicism or Buddhism.
I'll keep the book close by. It's full of quotations, and indeed can be read as a book of annotated quotations provided one appreciates it's much more. It deserves slow reading and returns to read again.
It's difficult to see it as a 'self-help' book since this associates it with so much rubbish out there. Yet, among the common beliefs of Stoicism and Buddhism is the central emphasis upon following a way, disciplining the mind and being yourself the one, the only source of help in this life.
She limits the scope of Buddhism to the early writings, presumably closest to the historical Buddha's thought. Including later developments would have been completely impractical. There's no lack of material quoted - I was surprised at the range of the suttas cited. There's no problem restricting the range of Stoic material to cover since unfortunately so little survives.
Macaro sees value in both approaches but not applied rigidly. Her approach is flexible, preferring what works to "what is written," so to speak. No stress is laid upon nirvana or the Stoic sage. Her approach takes what reasonable benefits regular people can receive. Her feet are fully planted on the ground, and her head not in the clouds.
Highly recommended to students of practical Buddhism or Stoicism, or both.
It's a fairly brief book and a quick read - no slogging!
Stoicism and Buddhism both teach us that it is not about tracking our desires but about abandoning them and that this can bring us real peace.
Zeno, the founder of the Stoic school of philosophy, defines emotion as »a movement of mind contrary to nature and turned away from right reason«. The author comments that this means that the functioning of a rational person is disturbed by the emotions. Therefore Macaro is more inclined to the philosophy of Aristotle, which promotes life balanced between the mind and the emotions. Stoics think that when it comes to emotions, there is nothing that can be called moderation. Pleasant and unpleasant feelings are so intertwined that they can quickly turn into their own opposite. We have to stop trying to obtain things that we may lose or fail to get and stop trying to avoid things we can't control and instead concentrating on seeking only moral good and avoiding moral evil. The reward is peace of mind and "smooth and undisturbed mind".
The author readily admits that what is covered will be "ruthlessly lean" and where "cherry-picking" will be the theme for both traditions. Strong points: good introductory book; writing style is easy-going, not too heavy on the jargon; and a robust overview of clarifying the troublesome term of "happiness" (at least from a western perspective). Weak points: breadth, not depth; and a rather strange way to begin and circle back to the Aristotelian "way" - that is, the middle ground when it comes to emotions and role of virtue. I think the author wishes to highlight the practical sues of Buddhism and Stoicism, and yet maintain a very "even-keeled" approach that is more of a mixed hybrid of several approaches and somehow, we end up back in the Peripatetic School.
In the end, perhaps we are back to Seneca's perspective of what the journey looks like with philosophy: Still searching, as there is so much more to discover along the way. Some people seek the comfort in dogma and doctrine, others seek to "follow the facts"...but then what is philosophy for...if not to raise more questions, than answers.